• Random House sued ME; not the other way around.
  • Random House filed suit to silence the facts I was posting on the web.
  • There has been NO trial on the facts, only the Random House effort to prevent a trial.
  • The only sworn statements made under penalty of perjury are affidavits from me and my experts, nothing from RH.
  • The judge refused to consider any expert analysis.
  • Despite suing me first, Random House & Sony UNsuccessfully demanded that I pay the $310,000 in legal fees they spent to sue me.
  • Contrary to the Random House spin, I am not alleging plagiarism of general issues, but of several hundred very specific ones.
  • This is not about money. Anything I win goes to charity.

Legal filings and the expert witness reports are HERE

I have a second blog, Writopia
which focuses on Dan Brown's pattern of falsehoods
and embellishment of his personal achievements.

Monday, August 01, 2005

Yet Another "Lay Reader" Finds Suspicious Similarities

The posts here have been sparse as we wait for the judge to decide whether to allow this to go to trial.

But in a post titled Big BROWNish Untalented Fraud?, this blogger doesn't wait for the judge to make his call.


Blogger Mark said...

Only one more Brown book to read: the first one. Deception Point took me a long time to choke down and it was predictable all the way through. I don't think that was the idea.

I've pointed out the similarities with A&D before. That's where it started on the church themes you wrote about decades earlier. Like my historian seems to have, he harvested a plowed and planted field. How close can one follow is the question.

Wed Aug 03, 05:59:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Lewis Perdue said...

Yes, the longer we go, the larger the crock needed to hold all the ....

Wed Aug 03, 06:46:00 AM PDT  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home