"Perdue's claim was not objectively unreasonable, and there was no evidence that Perdue pursued his claims with an improper motive and/or in bad faith."
-- U.S. District Court Judge George Daniels.
- Random House sued ME; not the other way around.
- Random House filed suit to silence the facts I was posting on the web.
- There has been NO trial on the facts, only the Random House effort to prevent a trial.
- NO expert testimony was allowed despite three international plagiarism experts who were willing to testif that it existed.
- The only sworn statements made under penalty of perjury are affidavits from me and my experts, nothing from RH.
- The judge refused to consider any expert analysis.
- Despite suing me first, Random House & Sony UNsuccessfully demanded that I pay the $310,000 in legal fees they spent to sue me.
- Contrary to the Random House spin, I am not alleging plagiarism of general issues, but of several hundred very specific ones.
- This is not about money. Anything I win goes to charity.
I have a second blog, Writopia
which focuses on Dan Brown's pattern of falsehoods
and embellishment of his personal achievements.
posted by Lewis Perdue at 7:09 AM
2 Comments:
Only one more Brown book to read: the first one. Deception Point took me a long time to choke down and it was predictable all the way through. I don't think that was the idea.
I've pointed out the similarities with A&D before. That's where it started on the church themes you wrote about decades earlier. Like my historian seems to have, he harvested a plowed and planted field. How close can one follow is the question.
Yes, the longer we go, the larger the crock needed to hold all the ....
Post a Comment
<< Home