The Da Vinci Exclusion - Covering Up The Smoking Gun
Could it be that one of my strongest pieces of evidence -- the repeated factual error -- was an INconvenient pothole on the decision's railroad to exonerating Random House and Dan Brown?
Back on April 24, I blogged about Random House's blatant fabrication that I had abandoned the claim. The judge's decision seems to have gone along with that and fails to address any of those similarities or the smoking gun.
The smoking gun is that Brown copied a factual error. A discussion of the experts and the repeated error can be found at this blog post.
Ignoring the evidence is not justice.