Perdue Perplexed - Part 2 - "Lay Readers" Email Plagiarism Thoughts
Here's a REALLY baffling one: On page one, line 11 of the Random House filing,, RH argues that "the only issue is whether, from the perspective of a discerning lay observer, the protectible elements of the two works -- not historical facts, ideas or scenes a faire -- are substantially similar."
I am not sure how much more of a lay observer you can get than the unsolicited emails I started to get from complete strangers telling me that they thought Code had plagiarized me. Some of those emails can be found beginning on page 48 of my complaint filed on Jan. 6, 2005
I don't quite understand why Random House would do this. Do you suppose they just forgot about those?
Maybe some reader out there can enlighten us on why Random House would make that statement?
========= RESOURCES ==========
A complete summary of filings can be found at the legal filing and resources page.
I am not sure how much more of a lay observer you can get than the unsolicited emails I started to get from complete strangers telling me that they thought Code had plagiarized me. Some of those emails can be found beginning on page 48 of my complaint filed on Jan. 6, 2005
I don't quite understand why Random House would do this. Do you suppose they just forgot about those?
Maybe some reader out there can enlighten us on why Random House would make that statement?
========= RESOURCES ==========
A complete summary of filings can be found at the legal filing and resources page.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home