Supremes Singing Different Tune
Word came down today that the U.S. Supreme Court denied my writ of certiorari and will not hear the case.
They didn't address the substance of my case at all -- it's just that the Supremes didn't want to deal with a messy inconsistency concerning federal adjudication of copyright infringement.
Thanks to that, justice in this sort of issue still depends on shopping for the right Federal Court to hear the case. That and megabucks for lots and lots of lawyers, some of which have a tenuous relationship with honesty and no respect at all for the facts.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court makes mistakes all the time. Hell, it took them over half a century to correct Plessey v. Ferguson.
One part of me is a little disappointed, but overall I am relieved to have this part of things over.
Not having to pay Random House's $300,000+ legal fee demand was the most important issue and having Seth Mnookin and his Vanity Fair article set straight the Random House spin machine pretty well established the point I had tried to make before RH sued me.
As my appellate attorney Luther Munford just said to me in an email, "I believe the petition makes it clear to anyone who cares about such things that Dan Brown and his wife certainly did copy Daughter of God in a substantial way."
They didn't address the substance of my case at all -- it's just that the Supremes didn't want to deal with a messy inconsistency concerning federal adjudication of copyright infringement.
Thanks to that, justice in this sort of issue still depends on shopping for the right Federal Court to hear the case. That and megabucks for lots and lots of lawyers, some of which have a tenuous relationship with honesty and no respect at all for the facts.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court makes mistakes all the time. Hell, it took them over half a century to correct Plessey v. Ferguson.
One part of me is a little disappointed, but overall I am relieved to have this part of things over.
Not having to pay Random House's $300,000+ legal fee demand was the most important issue and having Seth Mnookin and his Vanity Fair article set straight the Random House spin machine pretty well established the point I had tried to make before RH sued me.
As my appellate attorney Luther Munford just said to me in an email, "I believe the petition makes it clear to anyone who cares about such things that Dan Brown and his wife certainly did copy Daughter of God in a substantial way."
posted by Lewis Perdue at 8:28 AM
8 Comments:
Sorry. They just didn't want to dig into those issues.
But it's good to be done, finally, with the lawsuit RH filed. Thanks for your support over the years.
You're welcome. On to better things I suppose. I sure look twice at anything research I do from previously published material, but most of it is historical facts and the like. I learned a lot from your case. Continued good luck.
Sound familiar?
http://tessgerritsen.com/mephisto/
could be, but she tells good stories.
Yes she does. Every time I see written in blood though...
Turkey Awards
Scrivener gave you the nod finally after seeming to defend Brown before. Better late than never.
Sorry i continue with the same idea cause you have to know, Da vinci code is not a novel, it's a vendetta against me, Habans, and Brown is not a writer, he's an ethics'cop, and I probably know the man behind that, a french priest who has a very very big sense of DEONTOLOGY , as his jew friend who is used to advise "ethically" (vendetta) advertising executives in France. They have probably used the jew spying network to collect all these datas from my life, that cover the story. Yet I have never been anti-Semite; my only sin is to have used the private address I couldn't avoid to know, of a franco-colombian girl I 'd fallen in love with dramatically. But the man is gay, so it could explain, if he is the man behind, some people have told me he had helped a spy from CIA in the past.
Then, one should read the title like that : DA VICHY CODE. But in Colombia, there 's a lot of illegal traffics, and who benefits from the crime ?
I maintain nothing, i have just deep doubts...
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
lperdue@ideaworx.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 13): 550 5.7.1 lperdue@ideaworx.com... Rejecting due to security policy - Unable to validate Sender address 3sru1rw8hb3wmfgfsx.fzwjqnjssjzk.kwqujwizjnijf1tw2.htr@blogger.bounces.google.com, Please see: http://www.janey.net/spam-policy.html#invalidsender
----- Original message -----
Received: by 10.64.143.12 with SMTP id q12mr5528140qbd.1194702154559;
Sat, 10 Nov 2007 05:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1194702154547.eab441fa-a5a9-402f-bfec-c0c41f653559@google.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 05:42:34 -0800 (PST)
From: =?US-ASCII?Q?Aur=E9lien?= habans.aurelien@neuf.fr
To: lperdue@ideaworx.com
Subject: [The Da Vinci Crock] New comment on Supremes Singing Different
Tune.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_7886_7684682.1194702154550"
------=_Part_7886_7684682.1194702154550
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Aur=E9lien has left a new comment on your post "Supremes Singing
Different Tune":
Sorry i continue with the same idea cause you have to know, Da vinci
code is not a novel, it's a vendetta against me, Habans, and Brown is
not a writer, he's an ethics'cop, and I probably know the man behind
----- Message truncated -----
Post a Comment
<< Home