• Random House sued ME; not the other way around.
  • Random House filed suit to silence the facts I was posting on the web.
  • There has been NO trial on the facts, only the Random House effort to prevent a trial.
  • The only sworn statements made under penalty of perjury are affidavits from me and my experts, nothing from RH.
  • The judge refused to consider any expert analysis.
  • Despite suing me first, Random House & Sony UNsuccessfully demanded that I pay the $310,000 in legal fees they spent to sue me.
  • Contrary to the Random House spin, I am not alleging plagiarism of general issues, but of several hundred very specific ones.
  • This is not about money. Anything I win goes to charity.

Legal filings and the expert witness reports are HERE

I have a second blog, Writopia
which focuses on Dan Brown's pattern of falsehoods
and embellishment of his personal achievements.

Monday, April 25, 2005

The Thorough, Systematic Looting of My Work Is NOT "Isolated!"


After hundreds of pages of filings describing what are now thousands of specific, systematic similarities in every regard, imagine my surprise when, on the last line of page 1 of their April 22, 2005 filing, Random House claims that the comparisons -- including one by forensic linguist John Olsson -- are "isolated similarities."


Denial at work yet again?


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home