• Random House sued ME; not the other way around.
  • Random House filed suit to silence the facts I was posting on the web.
  • There has been NO trial on the facts, only the Random House effort to prevent a trial.
  • The only sworn statements made under penalty of perjury are affidavits from me and my experts, nothing from RH.
  • The judge refused to consider any expert analysis.
  • Despite suing me first, Random House & Sony UNsuccessfully demanded that I pay the $310,000 in legal fees they spent to sue me.
  • Contrary to the Random House spin, I am not alleging plagiarism of general issues, but of several hundred very specific ones.
  • This is not about money. Anything I win goes to charity.

Legal filings and the expert witness reports are HERE

I have a second blog, Writopia
which focuses on Dan Brown's pattern of falsehoods
and embellishment of his personal achievements.

Thursday, April 28, 2005

It is ALL About The Goddess

Beginning on page 3, the April 22, 2005 filing from Random House frequently repeats the already disproven concept that The Da Vinci Code is not about Sophia, the Great Goddess, the supreme divine feminine.

We addressed this in an earlier post "Dan Brown challenges the Notion That 'Mary Married Jesus' is REALLY What DV Code is about," but Random House seems determined to keep this misconception alive by repeating it time after time.

So, in addition to what Dan Brown says publicly about what DV Code is about, it's probably worth looking at what DV Code itself says:

This, from Chapter 60 of The Da Vinci Code: "The Priory of Sion, to this day, still worships Mary Magdalene as the Goddess, the Holy Grail, the Rose, and the Divine Mother."

There's more. But I fear that if I quote too much of DV Code, Random House will sue me for copyright infringement.


Blogger Mark said...

Nah you're well within fair use at a paragraph.

Thu Apr 28, 11:04:00 AM PDT  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home