PLEASE READ THESE FACTS FIRST:

  • Random House sued ME; not the other way around.
  • Random House filed suit to silence the facts I was posting on the web.
  • There has been NO trial on the facts, only the Random House effort to prevent a trial.
  • The only sworn statements made under penalty of perjury are affidavits from me and my experts, nothing from RH.
  • The judge refused to consider any expert analysis.
  • Despite suing me first, Random House & Sony UNsuccessfully demanded that I pay the $310,000 in legal fees they spent to sue me.
  • Contrary to the Random House spin, I am not alleging plagiarism of general issues, but of several hundred very specific ones.
  • This is not about money. Anything I win goes to charity.

Legal filings and the expert witness reports are HERE

I have a second blog, Writopia
which focuses on Dan Brown's pattern of falsehoods
and embellishment of his personal achievements.


Sunday, June 17, 2007

Nifong & Random House's Lawyers

Mike Nifong, the prosecutor who was disbarred for misleading the judge and defense lawyers in the Duke rape case has been disbarred. Simply stated, he lied for his own self interest.

This is not a lot different than what happened to me at the hands of the Random House lawyers.

Yes, that was a criminal case and this was a civil one. However, Random House assumed the role of prosecutor when they started the whole legal mess by suing me.

And throughout, (as pointed out by numerous, very specific examples drawn from legal filings) they misrepresented the facts, filed misleading briefs and in the process concealed information from the judge.

Should those lawyers not be subjected to the same standard of justice as Nifong?

10 Comments:

Blogger neights said...

Thanks to you Lew, everyone will
know soon that they are thieves.
YOU have mail!!!

Fri Sep 21, 06:17:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Lewis Perdue said...

Thanks for that sentiment. Yes, there is certainly a double standard. With few exceptions (like Nifong) lawyers can legally lie in court, leaving ordinary, honest citizens to learn that the law is not about justice and courts are not about truth.

Fri Sep 21, 07:29:00 AM PDT  
Blogger neights said...

Can I Have your e-mail as I have something personal to talk to you about.

Thats if your interested.

Tue Sep 25, 03:29:00 AM PDT  
Blogger neights said...

Don't you want to know why rh attact you? They thought it was you who was trying
to hold a monopoly on the background, artwork and that and
this code they wrote about
they thought it was your work! they
thought you were someone else!
They were ready and must have thought it was you and then unloaded everything onto you, thats why you couldn't understand
why they did this to you...

Sun Oct 14, 11:43:00 PM PDT  
Blogger NeightS said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Da_Vinci_Code This page is good.

Tue Nov 13, 02:03:00 AM PST  
Blogger NeightS said...

this link is even better

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Neights

Wed Dec 19, 03:04:00 AM PST  
Blogger NeightS said...

ASWELL AS

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:121.209.3.142

Sat Mar 29, 09:52:00 PM PDT  
Blogger NeightS said...

better cahange that to
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:121.209.3.142&oldid=201562386 cause of bias admins..

Mon Mar 31, 04:38:00 AM PDT  
Blogger NeightS said...

oops, it was this one with the juicy bits in it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:121.209.3.142&oldid=202034179

Mon Mar 31, 04:43:00 AM PDT  
Blogger NeightS said...

Took away emails so it's this one
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:121.209.3.142&oldid=201977903

Tue Apr 01, 12:35:00 AM PDT  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home